Which Is Best for Your Marketing?
Marketing attribution models help you understand which touchpoints drive conversions. There are two main types:
- Algorithmic attribution: Uses machine learning to analyze complex customer journeys across multiple touchpoints. Adapts to changing patterns.
- Rules-based attribution: Follows preset rules to assign credit. Simpler but less flexible.
Key differences:
| Feature | Algorithmic | Rules-Based |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Higher | Moderate |
| Data needs | Lots | Less |
| Setup | Complex | Simple |
| Cost | Higher | Lower |
| Best for | Large businesses, complex campaigns | Small businesses, simple marketing |
Choosing the right model depends on:
- Your business size and complexity
- Amount and quality of data
- Sales cycle length
- Marketing goals
- Available resources
No single “best” model exists – pick one that aligns with your strategy and provides actionable insights to improve marketing performance.
Related video from YouTube
What Are Algorithmic and Rules-Based Attribution?
Marketing pros need to know which touchpoints lead to conversions. That’s where attribution models come in. Let’s break down the two main types: algorithmic and rules-based attribution.
How Algorithmic Attribution Works
Imagine a super-smart computer that crunches numbers at lightning speed. That’s algorithmic attribution in a nutshell. It uses machine learning to analyze your marketing data.
Here’s the kicker: these models don’t just follow a set playbook. They learn from your data. They look at tons of customer journeys and spot patterns humans might miss.
Take Google Analytics 4, for example. It uses a data-driven model that looks at all touchpoints in a customer’s journey. It doesn’t just give credit to the first or last click. Instead, it figures out how important each interaction is based on real conversion data.
How Rules-Based Attribution Works
Rules-based attribution is more like following a recipe. It uses preset rules to give credit to different marketing touchpoints.
Some common rules-based models are:
- Last-click: All credit goes to the final touchpoint before conversion.
- First-click: All credit goes to the first interaction with your brand.
- Linear: Credit is spread evenly across all touchpoints.
- Time decay: More credit for touchpoints closer to the conversion.
Let’s say you’re using a last-click model. A customer clicks a Google ad, then a Facebook ad, and finally converts through an email. In this case, the email gets all the credit.
Main Differences Between Models
The big difference? Flexibility and complexity. Algorithmic models can handle complex, multi-touch customer journeys. They give you a more detailed view of how different channels work together.
Rules-based models are simpler and more transparent. You know exactly how credit is being assigned. But they might not tell the whole story, especially for businesses with complex marketing strategies.
Here’s a quick comparison:
| Feature | Algorithmic Attribution | Rules-Based Attribution |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | High | Low to Medium |
| Customization | Highly customizable | Limited to preset rules |
| Data Needs | Lots of data | Less data-intensive |
| Accuracy for Complex Journeys | High | Can be limited |
| Easy to Understand | Can be tricky | Usually straightforward |
Which model should you choose? It depends on your business. If you’re a small business with simple marketing channels, a rules-based model might do the trick. But for bigger companies with complex customer journeys, algorithmic attribution could uncover some game-changing insights.
Rules-Based Attribution Models Explained
Rules-based attribution models are the go-to for many marketing teams. They’re simple, easy to grasp, and offer quick insights into your marketing efforts. Let’s break down how these models work and where they excel (or fall short).
Types of Rules-Based Models
Here are the common rules-based attribution models marketers use:
1. Last-Click Attribution
This model gives all credit to the final touchpoint before conversion. It’s like thanking only the person who handed you the baton at the finish line of a relay race.
2. First-Click Attribution
The opposite of last-click, this model credits the first interaction a customer has with your brand. It’s great for understanding how customers initially find you.
3. Linear Attribution
This model spreads the credit equally. Every touchpoint gets the same amount of credit, regardless of when it occurred in the customer journey.
4. Time Decay
This model gives more credit to touchpoints closer to the conversion. It’s like a movie where the scenes near the end carry more weight than the opening credits.
5. Position-Based (U-Shaped)
This model gives 40% credit to both the first and last interactions, with the remaining 20% spread across the middle touchpoints.
Each model has its place. A B2B software company with a long sales cycle might find first-click attribution valuable for understanding which channels bring in new leads. An e-commerce site selling impulse-buy products might lean towards last-click to see what’s driving immediate purchases.
Strengths and Limits of Rules-Based Models
Rules-based attribution models have their ups and downs:
| Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|
| Easy to implement and understand | Can oversimplify complex customer journeys |
| Provides quick insights | May ignore important touchpoints |
| Consistent and predictable | Doesn’t adapt to changing customer behavior |
| Good for specific campaign goals | Can lead to biased budget allocation |
| Helps establish performance benchmarks | Might not reflect true impact of all channels |
The biggest strength of rules-based models? Their simplicity. As Daasity, an e-commerce analytics platform, puts it:
“The secret behind attribution is that there isn’t really a single ‘right’ answer about how to approach it and which model to use.”
This flexibility lets marketers choose a model that fits their specific goals.
But these models can also skew perspectives. Last-click attribution might make you pour all your budget into bottom-of-funnel activities, neglecting the awareness-building channels that initially brought customers to your brand.
Take a mid-sized retail company that switched from last-click to a position-based model. They found that their social media campaigns, which seemed ineffective before, were actually key in starting customer journeys that ended in purchases through other channels. This led to a 20% increase in their social media budget and a 15% boost in overall conversions within three months.
Remember, no single attribution model tells the whole story. As marketing evolves, so should your approach to attribution. Many successful companies use multiple models to get a fuller picture of their marketing effectiveness.
Next up, we’ll look at how algorithmic attribution models tackle some of the limitations of rules-based approaches, offering a more nuanced view of the customer journey.
Algorithmic Attribution Models Explained
Algorithmic attribution models are the powerhouse of modern marketing analytics. They use machine learning and AI to process vast amounts of data, giving marketers a clear view of what’s driving conversions.
Think of it this way: While rules-based models follow a set recipe, algorithmic models are like expert chefs. They taste, adjust, and create based on the ingredients at hand.
Here’s what makes them stand out: These models don’t just look at who converted. They also analyze the paths of those who didn’t. This gives you a full picture of your customer’s journey.
Take Google’s data-driven attribution model in Google Ads and Analytics 4. It compares the paths of converters and non-converters to spot patterns that might slip past human eyes.
But Google’s not the only player. Ruler Analytics uses the Markov chain model. This tech tracks and values all your marketing touchpoints, showing how each one impacts conversions.
You might wonder, “Does it actually work?” The numbers say yes. Google found that data-driven attribution helped marketers increase conversions by 30% to 60%, while cutting cost-per-conversion rates by 20% to 30%. That’s a big win.
But here’s the catch: You need data. A lot of it. For Google Ads, you’re looking at 3,000 ad interactions and 300 conversions in 30 days. For Google Analytics 4, aim for 600-1,000 conversions per month and 28 days of historical data.
Let’s look at a real case. Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), a major IT services company, faced a challenge with their long sales cycle. They decided to combine algorithmic and rules-based attribution. The result? They got a clearer picture of their marketing effectiveness and saw a big increase in leads year over year.
Benefits and Drawbacks
Algorithmic attribution has its pros and cons. Here’s a quick overview:
| Benefits | Drawbacks |
|---|---|
| Deep insights into customer behavior | Needs lots of data to work well |
| Identifies effective marketing channels | May miss offline touchpoints |
| Enables smarter marketing strategies | Can be complex to set up and understand |
| Adapts to changes in customer behavior | Potentially higher costs for advanced tools |
| More accurate than simple models | Requires sophisticated data analysis skills |
The key takeaway? Algorithmic attribution is powerful, but it’s not a magic solution. You need good data, the right tools, and the skills to interpret the results.
Mikkel Settnes from Dreamdata suggests:
“The data-driven attribution model can be combined with (customized) rule-based models such that a certain part of the credit is determined by a rule-based model, while we assign the remaining part using the data-driven model.”
This mixed approach can give you the best of both worlds: the flexibility of algorithmic models with the simplicity of rules-based ones.
sbb-itb-f16ed34
How the Models Compare
Picking between algorithmic and rules-based models for marketing attribution can make or break your strategy. Let’s see how these two stack up.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Here’s a quick look at how algorithmic and rules-based attribution models measure up:
| Feature | Algorithmic Attribution | Rules-Based Attribution |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | High – handles complex journeys | Moderate – uses preset rules |
| Flexibility | Highly customizable | Limited to preset models |
| Data Needs | Needs lots of data | Less data-hungry |
| Setup | Complex, needs experts | Simpler, often built-in |
| Cost | Pricier upfront | Usually cheaper |
| Scalability | Grows with more data | Can struggle with complex campaigns |
| Insights | Deep, data-driven | Basic, rule-based |
| External Factors | Considers market conditions | Doesn’t adjust for outside stuff |
Let’s break it down further.
Accuracy and Insights
Algorithmic models are the heavy hitters for accuracy. They use machine learning to crunch tons of data, spotting patterns humans might miss. Google’s data-driven attribution in Google Ads and Analytics 4 is a prime example. It compares converter and non-converter paths, giving you the real scoop on what drives conversions.
Rules-based models, like last-click or first-click, keep it simple. They’re great for a quick look at specific parts of the customer journey, but they might miss the big picture.
Cost and Setup
Rules-based models are the go-to for smaller businesses or newbies. They’re often built into web analytics tools and easy to set up. But they’re not great at optimizing or considering outside factors.
Algorithmic models cost more upfront. You need fancy tools and often experts to set them up and make sense of the data. But for businesses with complex marketing, it can be worth every penny.
Real-World Impact
Let’s look at some real examples:
1. Google’s Data-Driven Attribution
Google found that advertisers using their data-driven attribution boosted conversions by 30% to 60% and cut cost-per-conversion by 20% to 30%. That’s the power of algorithmic models in action.
2. Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) Case Study
CSC, a big IT services company, had a long sales cycle problem. They mixed algorithmic and rules-based attribution. The result? They got a clearer picture of their marketing effectiveness and saw a big jump in leads year over year.
3. Tesco‘s Attribution Challenge
A Tesco case study showed that up to 80% of data was wrongly categorized when using Google Analytics 360, which uses the Shapley model (an algorithmic approach). This shows that even fancy models can mess up with bad data.
Picking Your Model
Your choice should fit your business. As Sam Hurley, Founder of optim-eyez.co.uk, says:
“There is no right or wrong attribution model – You must align your choice with your own unique digital strategy and data.”
If you’ve got simple marketing channels and not much data, a rules-based model might do the trick. But if you’re dealing with complex customer journeys across multiple touchpoints, an algorithmic model could uncover gold.
How to Choose the Right Model
Picking the best attribution model for your business isn’t easy. It’s not one-size-fits-all. You need to think about what your business needs, what you want to achieve, and what you can handle. Here’s how to make this important choice:
Look at Your Business Size and Complexity
How big is your business? How many marketing channels do you use? These questions matter when choosing an attribution model.
If you’re just starting out or you’re a small business with only a few marketing channels, you might be fine with a simple model like last-click attribution. It’s easy to set up and can quickly show you which channels are getting people to buy.
But if you’re a bigger company using lots of different marketing channels, you’ll probably want something more advanced. Algorithmic attribution models can handle complicated customer journeys and give you a better idea of how each touchpoint is working.
Check Your Data Situation
The amount and quality of data you have is a big deal when picking an attribution model.
Got lots of good data from many channels? A data-driven attribution model could be your best bet. For example, Google’s data-driven model needs at least 3,000 ad interactions and 300 conversions in 30 days to work well.
Working with less data or fewer touchpoints? A rules-based model might be better for you. These can still give you useful insights without needing tons of data.
Think About Your Sales Cycle
How long does it take for someone to decide to buy from you? This should affect your choice of attribution model.
If people usually buy quickly (like in some online stores), a position-based model could work well. This gives 40% of the credit to both the first and last interactions, with the remaining 20% spread out over the middle touchpoints.
For businesses where it takes longer to make a sale (like B2B companies or those selling complex products), a time decay model or an algorithmic approach might be better. These can handle lots of touchpoints over a long period.
Match Your Marketing Goals
Your attribution model should help you meet your marketing objectives.
| If You Want To… | Try This Model |
|---|---|
| Understand how you’re getting new customers | First-click attribution |
| Focus on final sales | Last-click attribution |
| Get a balanced view of the customer journey | Linear or position-based attribution |
| Get detailed insights across all channels | Data-driven attribution |
Look at Your Resources
What can you afford? How much tech know-how do you have? How much time can you spend on this? Your answers will affect your choice.
If you’re short on resources, rules-based models are usually easier to set up and run. They’re often built into web analytics tools and don’t need as much technical expertise.
If you have more to spend and more expertise, algorithmic models can give you more accurate and detailed insights. But they usually cost more and need skilled people to set them up and understand the data.
Try, Learn, and Adjust
Remember, you’re not stuck with one attribution model forever. As Andreas Reiffen, a well-known marketing expert, says:
“I am a strong believer that there is no one perfect attribution method. The model should align with the questions that you are trying to ask – and in that process, it should shine a light on whether or not each of your campaigns is performing as intended.”
Start with a model that fits your situation now, but be ready to change as your business grows and your marketing strategies change. Keep checking your attribution data and be willing to switch models if you’re not getting the insights you need.
Steps to Set Up Attribution Models
Here’s how to set up an effective attribution model:
1. Define Your Goals and KPIs
Start by nailing down what you want to achieve. Are you after more conversions? Better ROI? A clearer picture of your customer’s journey? Your goals will shape your model and metrics.
2. Choose Your Attribution Model
Pick a model that fits your business:
| Model Type | Best For | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Last-click | Quick insights, simple campaigns | E-commerce with short sales cycles |
| First-click | Understanding acquisition channels | B2B lead generation |
| Linear | Balanced view of all touchpoints | Multi-channel campaigns |
| Time decay | Emphasizing recent interactions | Promotional campaigns |
| Data-driven | Complex, multi-touch journeys | Large businesses with diverse marketing mix |
3. Gather and Integrate Data
Pull data from all your sources: website analytics, CRM systems, ad platforms, email tools, and social media. Make sure it’s clean and consistent.
“The quality of your attribution model is only as good as the data you feed into it. Garbage in, garbage out.” – Andreas Reiffen, marketing expert
4. Implement Your Chosen Model
For Google Analytics 4 (GA4):
- Go to “Advertising” in the left menu
- Click “Attribution Settings”
- Pick your model
For other platforms, check their docs for setup steps.
5. Analyze and Interpret Results
Once you’re up and running, dig into the data. Look for top channels, weak spots, and any surprises.
6. Test and Refine
Keep an eye on your results and be ready to tweak things. Try using multiple models to compare.
“There is no right or wrong attribution model – You must align your choice with your own unique digital strategy and data.” – Sam Hurley, Founder of optim-eyez.co.uk
7. Act on Your Insights
Use what you learn to make smart marketing moves. You might:
- Shift budget to high-performing channels
- Fix underperforming touchpoints
- Adjust your overall strategy
The point of all this? To get insights you can use to boost your marketing game.
Key Takeaways
Picking between algorithmic and rules-based attribution models isn’t a one-size-fits-all deal. Your choice depends on your business needs, data, and marketing setup. Here’s what you need to know:
The Basics
Algorithmic attribution uses machine learning to crunch complex customer journey data across multiple touchpoints. It’s flexible and adapts to changing patterns. Rules-based models? They stick to preset rules for credit assignment. Simpler, but less adaptable.
Size Matters
Got a small business with straightforward marketing? Rules-based models might do the trick. Think of an online store with a quick sales cycle – a last-click model could work well. But if you’re running a bigger operation with lots of marketing channels, algorithmic models will likely give you more accurate insights.
Data: The Fuel
Your data’s quality and quantity are crucial. Take Google’s data-driven attribution model – it needs at least 3,000 ad interactions and 300 conversions in 30 days to work properly. If you’ve got loads of data, algorithmic models can uncover some real gems. Limited data? Rules-based models can still be useful.
Match Your Goals
Your attribution model should line up with what you’re trying to achieve. Focused on new customer acquisition? A first-click model might be your best bet. Want to see the whole customer journey? Try a linear or position-based model.
Ready to Change
As your business grows, your attribution needs might shift. Start simple and work your way up to more complex models as you get better at analysis. Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) mixed algorithmic and rules-based attribution to get different perspectives. The result? Better budgeting and a big jump in leads year-over-year.
The Bottom Line
Choosing the right model can seriously boost your marketing game. Google found that advertisers using their data-driven attribution increased conversions by 30% to 60% and reduced cost-per-conversion by 20% to 30%.
Sam Hurley, Founder of optim-eyez.co.uk, puts it well:
“There is no right or wrong attribution model – You must align your choice with your own unique digital strategy and data.”
The key? Pick a model that gives you actionable insights, helps you fine-tune your marketing mix, and drives your business growth.
FAQs
What are the benefits of data-driven attribution?
Data-driven attribution beats traditional models like last-click attribution in several ways:
1. More accurate credit assignment
It splits credit across all touchpoints a customer interacted with, not just the last one. This gives you a real picture of how each channel impacts your conversions.
2. Smarter budget allocation
By showing the true value of each marketing touchpoint, you can spend your money where it counts. Google found that advertisers using this method boosted conversions by 30% to 60% and cut cost-per-conversion by 20% to 30%.
3. Always learning
These models use machine learning to crunch your marketing data and get smarter over time. As your campaigns change, the attribution model adapts.
4. Fuels automated bidding
When you use automated bidding on platforms like Google Ads, data-driven attribution feeds in detailed info on which keywords, ads, and ad groups are your conversion champions.
5. Full view of the customer journey
By looking at both converted and non-converted paths, you get insights into the whole customer journey, not just the finish line.
Here’s how Google puts it:
“Data-driven attribution gives credit for conversions based on how people engage with your various ads and decide to become your customers.”
But here’s the catch: data-driven attribution needs a lot of data to work its magic. For instance, Google’s model requires at least 3,000 ad interactions and 300 conversions in 30 days to give you reliable results.
